"Representations of the 'art world' as wholly distinct from the 'real world,' like representations of the 'institution' as discrete and separate from 'us,' serve specific functions in art discourse. They maintain an imaginary distance between the social and economic interests we invest in through our activities and the euphemized artistic, intellectual, and even political 'interests' (or disinterests) that provide those activities with content and justify their existence. And with these representations, we also reproduce the mythologies of volunteerist freedom and creative omnipotence that have made art and artists such attractive emblems for neoliberalism's entrepreneurial, 'ownership-society' optimism. That such optimism has found perfect artistic expression in neo-Fluxus practices like relational aesthetics, which are now in perpetual vogue, demonstrates the degree to which what [Peter] Burger called the avant-garde's aim to integrate 'art into life praxis' has evolved into a highly ideological form of escapism. but this is not just about ideology. We are not only symbols of the rewards of the current regime: In this art market, we are its direct beneficiaries."
Andrea Fraser, "From the Critique of Institutions to an Institution of Critique," Artforum, vol. 44, no. 1, September 2005
