“The very idea of the international survey exhibition is now questioned at its most fundamental level. However progressive the political or economic intentions behind them, international survey exhibitions still invite a presumption that the curators have access to an illusionary world view, and that spectators may follow in their wake. But a more specific and sustained engagement with communities and audiences, creating meanings beyond the spectacular and mere festivalizing of such occasions, may produce a new genre of exhibition. It seems that in order to accommodate both artists’ needs and audience demands, the new exhibition must have reciprocity and dialogue built into its structure. How successfully this is accomplished will determine international exhibition maps of the future.”
Bruce W. Ferguson, Reesa Greenberg, and Sandy Nairne, "On Taking a Normal Situation and Retranslating It into Overlapping and Multiple Readings of Conditions Past and Present" (Antwerp: E. Antonis, 1993)
In the light of this remark, what does the 10th International Biennial suggest? Although I have heard many negative comments from a number of art professionals, I always tend to underline that I liked the dialogue between the works and the venues in which they are exhibited. Instead of creating a local exoticism, the 10B leads to an uncanny interaction through the spaces that Hou Hanru has chosen, especially Ataturk Cultural Centre and Istanbul Textile Traders' Market--significant examples of 'modern' Turkish urban architecture, which share the fate to be torn down in the near future-- as well as santralistanbul that has been transformed from the first electric thermal plant of the Republic of Turkey into a culture and arts center. With a focus of an inquiry of modernization in developing countries, I believe the 10B offers a new expansion in Turkey where the art production is predominantly understood as a part of the national identity. As the art merges with urbanism and architecture, the artworks encounter an innovative reception and offer social intervention in a 'peripheral' city, suggesting a negotiation and reciprocity between the global and local. Thus, the 10B eventually fosters an intellectual debate, which is proved to be quite controversial in regards to Kemalism and republican ideals. Therefore, I believe, the structure of the 10th Istanbul Biennial engenders dialogue, which is produced both in an implicit and explicit fashion.
